EPA should not list combined ratings for upcoming electric vehicles
Monday, February 15th, 2010This next paragraph is going to sound like a grade-school mathematics word problem, but bear with me. The Chevy Volt has an electric motor and a battery. When the battery is depleted, a gas generator kicks in to power the electric motor and extend the range. Chevy says their battery will power 40-miles of driving. So a person who drives less than 40-miles a day might only use gas on rare occasions. So for that person, a displayed rating of 40-miles-per-charge would be the most useful rating. For a person who regularly takes a 400 mile drive from Los Angeles to San Francisco, 90% of their drive would be powered by the generator. For them, the number they’d need to see would be how may miles-per-gallon they’d get. The EPA’s current label design would fail to communicate anything of use to either the people in these examples.
Instead, they’re doing some kind of weird combined rating that relates to kilowatt-hours used per 100 miles of travel. This awards the Chevy Volt a rating of 236 mpg. Sounds impressive, but that’s not a number that relates to one’s experience of using the car. I typically drive less than 100 miles a week. If I were in the market for an electric vehicle, I’d use zero gallons of gas most weeks. ∞ mpg?
Here’s the EPA draft label, for the BMW Mini-E. That car can travel 156 miles on a single charge. It’d be much more useful if that range were just printed on the label, rather than “33kW-hr/100 miles (equivalent to 102 MPG)”.
EPA, if you’re listening, please label electric cars as follows. Show the distance the car can go on a single battery charge. If the vehicle switches to another fuel when the battery is depleted, then separately show the distance it can go on that fuel along with the size of that fuel tank. Nice and simple. 2 big numbers (distance ranges), one small number (size of secondary fuel tank). The car manufacturers wouldn’t be able to tout awesomely high miles-per-gallon ratings, but it’d be a more honest and intelligible way to rate methods of propulsion that use fuel not measured by the gallon.


























