First impressions: Panasonic DMC-LZ8 digital point-and-shoot camera

A nice cup of espresso at Panini Di Ambra served to test the DMC-LZ8’s macro focusing capabilities. Some very fine detail in the foam is visible at full resolution. Nice. Click the photo to visit a gallery of my DMC-LZ8 test photos.
Why that low grade? Because after the camera has responded to the user’s commands, the lens has focused and zoomed, the image has been focused on the sensor, and the sensor has captured an image, Panasonic’s Venus Engine IV software goes to work. It takes the raw image off the sensor, processes it, and writes a file to the memory card. The problem is in the processing — digital images contain some amount of noise, and this noise can be reduced by applying noise reduction algorithms. But there is a downside to noise reduction, as these algorithms reduce the level of detail in the image. Every manufacturer approaches this tradeoff in their own way, but Panasonic’s decision is very unfortunate.
The Panasonic DMC-LZ8 (and apparently most other Panasonic digital cameras) suffers from an overly aggressive style of noise reduction. The user can set the noise reduction to be reduced in one of the camera’s menus, but it can’t be reduced nearly enough, and can’t be disabled. It doesn’t appear to be possible to shoot a photo that is not visibly mangled by Panasonic’s digital noise reduction.

A few slices of Pizza at Il Panini Di Ambra in Hollywood. The camera’s automatic white balance could not cope (the photo was pretty green), but the tools in Aperture were easily up to the challenge.
The problem is not limited to the Panasonic DMC-LZ8, as is attested by this internet petition which asks Panasonic to release a firmware update for several other Panasonic cameras to allow users to choose to disable noise reduction. I would also prefer to disable the camera’s noise reduction feature, because it is easy to apply noise reduction in computer to shots that really need it, and 9 times out of 10 I prefer the organic look of the noise itself to the painterly look of noise reduction.
Gripes aside, the camera seems nice in all other aspects, and for $111 I’m happy with it. It’s small, fast, cheap, and the images are reasonably good (they’d be great if not for the problem noted above). If I’d paid the suggested retail price of $179 I’d probably already be in the process of returning the camera and replacing it with the Canon SD870IS, but at $111 I’m content. I don’t intend to use this as my primary camera. Le mieux est l’ennemi du bien.

When viewed at full resolution (courtesy of Aperture’s "Loupe" tool), the ridiculously aggressive digital noise reduction that the Panasonic DMC-LZ8 has applied by default to this bright outdoor shot is apparent. Note the strange rippled texture to what should be smooth and in-focus glass. Is Panasonic trying to say something about the folly of realism by turning every photo impressionist?
















September 8th, 2008 at 9:55 pm
Photos: feel is more important than clarity.